Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()

Source: Christie, Manson and Woods catalog, ([])

Cue: "Shipped Mss. (up to & including Chaptr 55,)"

Source format: "Sales catalog"

Letter type: "[standard letter]"

Notes:

Last modified: 2024-02-21T09:19:09

Revision History: HES | RHH 2024-02-21

MTPDocEd
To Elisha Bliss, Jr.
11 July 1871 • Elmira, N.Y. (Christie 1994, lot 221, UCCL 11888)
Friend Bliss:

Shippedemendation Mss. (up to & including Chapter 55,) this evening.1explanatory note Let me know if you receive it.2explanatory note

Yours
Mark.

It goes by Express.

letter docketed: emendation 1871

Textual Commentary
11 July 1871 • To Elisha Bliss, Jr.Elmira, N.Y.UCCL 11888
Source text(s):

Christie 1994, lot 221, which indicates that the letter is “to ‘Friend Bliss’ and discusses the sending of a manuscript. Elmira, 11 July docketed 1871. One page, 8vo, written in purple ink.

Previous Publication:

L5 , 691.

Provenance:

The MS is tipped into the first volume of set 227 of the 25-volume Author’s Edition De Luxe of Mark Twain’s works (London: Chatto and Windus, 1899–1903), sold in 1994 as part of the estate of lyricist Johnny Burke.

Explanatory Notes
1 

Clemens did not submit his manuscript for Roughing It to Bliss all at once, but forwarded it in several batches. On 10 July 1871 he promised to “fix up & forward” his fourth batch the next day ( L4 , 431). The editors of the 1993 edition of Roughing It showed that since Clemens added out-of-sequence chapters both before and during typesetting, his manuscript chapter numbers did not match those in the printed book. They conjectured that after July four chapters (36, 49, 52, and 53) were added, while one (the Mountain Meadows massacre narrative) was removed to an appendix: the difference between manuscript and book numbers was therefore four minus one, or three. The batch of manuscript transmitted on 11 July was thought to include book chapters 54–57, numbered 51–54 in the manuscript. This conjecture was based in part on a variation in the printed chapter headings for chapters 58–75, 77, and 79—evidence that chapter 57 was probably the last in a batch, and that chapter 58 began another batch, typeset at a later date. The present letter, discovered in 1994, suggests that book chapter 57 corresponded to Clemens’s “Chapter 55”—the last in his batch—rather than to manuscript chapter 54, as previously conjectured. If only three chapters, instead of four, were added late (36, 49, and 53), the difference between manuscript and book chapter numbers would have been only two. It now seems likely that the 11 July batch comprised five chapters, numbered 51–55 in the manuscript, 52 and 54–57 in the book (53 was probably a late addition) (see RI 1993 , 814–15, 852–62; L4 , 432 n. 4).

2 

No reply is known to survive.

Emendations and Textual Notes
  Elmira, 11 July. •  reported, not quoted
  Shipped •  no ¶ Shipped
  letter docketed: 1871 •  reported, not quoted
Top