8 August 1876 • Elmira, N.Y. (MS: CU-MARK, UCCL 01356)
Everything O. K. So that’s all right. I will remark, though, in passing, that no proposition has ever been made to Dustin of any kind—& none received from Dustin—so that report falls to the ground.2explanatory note I have made propositions to no publisher.
Yes, I like the idea of issuing Nov. 1st—or Dec. 1st or 15th,—whichever date seems best. What I am after is the best date. of the three. Choose it yourself. If you think it best to issue Dec. 15, & begin canvassing Nov. 1st 4 or 5 weeks before that date, all right. That would make it essentially a holiday book & give it its very best chance, perhaps.
But if you prefer another date, let it be Nov. 1st, so as to get the month or 5 weeks’ canvassing done before the election.
I think the advantage lies with Dec. 15—don’t you?
But whichever date is chosen, let us make sure to be out promptly on that very day, & with an edition that will amply supply every order, so that there shall be no complaint on that head.3explanatory note
I remember, now, you explained the inexpediency of offering prizes, once before. So that may as well be dropped.4explanatory note
I want the “Atlantic” notice of “Sawyer” to be put into the prospectus & in the slips that go to editors, for I think & a line or two of it in your advertisements, for I think it will have a good effect.5explanatory note I wish I had some of the English notices, but I suppose they have been thrown aside & lost at my house in Hartford, as I did not order any newspapers to be forwarded here.6explanatory note
I have just returned Chap. 10, or 11, I forget which—of Sawyer. They are admirably clean, nice proofs. One does not curse & swear over them.
HⒶemendation I have received Warner’s book, & it is a very handsome piece of typograpl hy &c. Haven’t read but 1st Chap—only got it last night.7explanatory note
Let me know which of the two dates of publication you decide to use,.
The enclosed notice, from the Spectator has just come. I have bracketed good sentences in it, but it is all good, & possibly you can find use for it.
Chatto and Windus think
Company here to dinner—so I will quit.
enclosure simulated, line by line: 8explanatory note
The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. By Mark Twain (Chatto and Windus.)—This tale of boy-life on the other side of the Atlantic will amuse many readers, old as well as young. There is a certain fresh- ness and novelty about it, a practically romantic character, so to speak, which will make it very attractive. Desert islands and the like are all very well to read about, but boys know that they are not likely to come in their way; but an island in the Mississippi where they can really play Robinson Crusoe, catch fish to eat, and in a way, actually live like real runaways, looks true. Altogether, Tom Sawyer’s lot was cast in a region not so tamed down by conventionalities, as is that in which English boys are doomed to live. Hence he had rare opportunities, and saw rare sights, actual tragedies, which our tamer life is content to read about in books. Of course, what Mark Twain writes is sure to be amusing. There are passages in this volume which no gravity could resist. Notably there is that in which is detailed Tom’s experience with the “pain-killer,” which his too-careful aunt administered to him in the hope of benefiting his health. For a while, Tom was content to hand it over to a crack in the floor. But one day the cat came along and begged for a share, and the temptation was irresistible. The animal, of course, performed the most amazing antics before the old lady’s eyes. Tom, asked for an explanation, demurely answers “’Deed, I don’t know, Aunt Polly; cats always act so when they’re having a good time.” Pressed with the truth, and asked why he had treated “that poor dumb beast so,” he continues, “I done it out of pity for him,—because he hadn’t any aunt.” Tom Sawyer is certainly a book to be read.
letter docketed by Bliss: ✓ Private and by his staff: Saml L. Clemens | Elmira | Aug 8 ″76 N.Y.
The letter that Clemens answered, which replied to his of 22 Julyclick to open letter, has not been found.
Charles E. Dustin’s and Julius S. Gilman’s Hartford subscription publishing firm, Dustin, Gilman and Company, was a rival of Bliss’s American Publishing Company (24 Mar 1874 to Aldrich, L6 , 91 n. 2).
The date finally chosen for publication of the American edition of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer was 8 December 1876 ( TS 1980, 25).
For Clemens’s proposal of a prize incentive for book agents, see 22 July 1876 to Blissclick to open letter.
Howell’s review of Tom Sawyer had appeared in the May 1876 Atlantic Monthly, seven months before publication (see 3 Apr 1876click to open letter and 26 Apr 1876click to open letter, both to Howells). Three paragraphs from it were excerpted in the salesmen’s prospectus (TS 1980, 25). The entire review is reprinted in the Appendix “Reviews of The Adventures of Tom Sawyerclick to open letter.”
Mummies and Moslems (Warner 1876a) , which Clemens had requested on 1 Augustclick to open letter; they were shipped two days later (Gribben 1980, 2:xxx).
The review from the London Spectator of 15 July 1876 (901) must have been sent by Moncure Conway, in his unrecovered letter of mid-July (1 Aug 1876 to Conwayclick to open letter, n. 1).The actual clipping with Clemens’s brackets, does not survive with the letter; it is transcribed here from the Spectator.
MS, CU-MARK. The enclosed clipping from the London Spectator for 15 July 1876, 901, does not survive. The text is transcribed from a microfilm copy of the newspaper.
MTLP , 104–5: MicroML, reel 4.
See Mendoza Collection in Description of Provenanceclick to open letter.