Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()

Source: Harvard University, Houghton Library, Cambridge, Mass ([MH-H])

Cue: "I am very"

Source format: "MS"

Letter type: "[standard letter]"

Notes:

Last modified:

Revision History: AB

MTPDocEd
To William Dean Howells
15 January 1875 • Hartford, Conn. (MS: MH-H, UCCL 01180)
My Dear Howells:

I am very glad you like it; & glad, too, that there wasn’t any profanity emendationin it, since you read it to Mrs. Howells; though I have noticed that a little judicious profanity helps out an otherwise ineffectual sketch or poem remarkably.1explanatory note I attribute the feebleness of many of Tupper’s noblest efforts to the lack of this element.2explanatory note

You said once that you wanted a snapper put on to the end of this No. 3, but I judge you have concluded to leave it as it is—which is doubtless best, for it is already plenty long enough.3explanatory note

Upon second thought, it is too much trouble to make a whole lot of corrections over again in the duplicate proof in order to “simultane” with Temple Bar, & so I’m not going to do it. I a have already broken my promise twice to Mr. Bentley, & the penall ty for a third infraction cannot increase my calamities much hereafter, & besides it may chance to be wholly overlooked amid the multitude of my sins. So you needn’t bother about sending me the duplicate proofs.4explanatory note

Susie is croupy, but today emendationwe believe it isn’t going to be serious.

Ys Ever
Mark.

P. S. I mail you, either in this or another envelop, No. 4—which I have just added a snapper to it. True story, too.5explanatory note

Textual Commentary
15 January 1875 To William Dean HowellsHartford, Conn.UCCL 01180
Source text(s):

MS, Houghton Library, Harvard University (MH-H, shelf mark bMS Am 1784 [98]).

Previous Publication:

L6 , 350–51; MTHL , 1:59–60.

Provenance:

see Howells Letters in Description of Provenance.

Explanatory Notes
1 

On 12 January Howells sent the following note (CU-MARK), evidently with proofsheets of the third installment of “Old Times on the Mississippi,” scheduled for March publication in the Atlantic:

memorandum. from h. o. houghton & co. publishers, printers, and binders,

riverside press, cambridge, mass.

to                

Dear Clemens:

This number is extraordinarily good. I’ve just been reading it to my wife, who’s delighted with it.

W. D. H.

Clemens had earlier expunged some profanity from the second installment (see 14 Dec 74 to Howellsclick to open letter). The correction of Howells’s date, in black ink (Howells used purple), may have been by Clemens.

2 

Martin Farquhar Tupper (1810–89) was the author of Proverbial Philosophy (1838), a popular work of commonplace maxims in verse form.

4 

Clemens had met George Bentley, the editor of Temple Bar magazine, in London in 1873. Bentley rejected the sketch Clemens offered him at that time, but specifically requested another, which Clemens declined to write ( L5 , 454–55). In his unrecovered January letter (see 12 Jan 74 to Howells, n. 1), Clemens presumably had explained that he wanted to publish his “Old Times” articles in Bentley’s magazine, simultaneously with the Atlantic, in order to secure an Imperial copyright. The failure to secure such a copyright allowed the Belford Brothers of Toronto to publish their pirated edition of the articles in 1876 (SLC 1876; Roper, 38–47).

5 

No enclosure survives with the letter. The fourth installment of “Old Times,” published in the April Atlantic, ends with the story of a pilot whose skill at the wheel while sleepwalking prompted another pilot to remark, “I never saw anything so gaudy before. And if he can do such gold-leaf, kid-glove, diamond-breastpin piloting when he is sound asleep, what could n’t he do if he was dead!” (SLC 1875, 452).

Emendations and Textual Notes
  profanity •  possibly g profanity’
  today •  to- | day
Top