Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()

Source: CU-MARK ([CU-MARK])

Cue: "Livy darling, we had a royal time till midnight at Howells' last night"

Source format: "MS"

Letter type: "[standard letter]"

Notes:

Last modified: 2017-01-05T11:19:28

Revision History: AB | RHH 2017-01-05

MTPDocEd
To Olivia L. Clemens
14 November 1874 • Boston, Mass. (MS: CU-MARK, UCCL 01152)

Livy darling, we had a royal time till midnight at Howells’ last night.1explanatory note Howells dines with us tonight2explanatory note & we lunch with him Monday.3explanatory note This hakky is for the Modoc with my great love. I bought it for 10 cents at Newton, eleven miles out of Hartford.4explanatory note You had a sentence in your letter that all the culture & all the genius & all the practice in the world could not improve. It was admirable.5explanatory note With all my heart,

Yours,
Saml
Textual Commentary
14 November 1874 • To Olivia L. ClemensBoston, Mass.UCCL 01152
Source text(s):

MS, Mark Twain Papers, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley (CU-MARK).

Previous Publication:

L6 , 282–285; MFMT , 67, brief excerpt; LLMT , 193.

Provenance:

see Samossoud Collection in Description of Provenance.

Explanatory Notes
1 

As soon as he received Clemens’s telegram of 13 November, Howells replied with a telegram sent to Young’s Hotel. Twichell preserved it in his journal: “You and Twitchell come right out to thirty seven 37 Concord Avenue Cambridge, near observatory Party waiting for you W. D. Howells.” He then noted:

We got ready as soon as we could (our baggage had been forwarded) and reached Howells’ at about 9 o’clock. Found a party there. I talked with Miss Longfellow, for one. Saw Miss Hawthorne, also John Fiske. Also Larkin G. Mead the sculptor (Howells’ bro-in-law) and his wife. Found our little Susie’s photograph (the one presented them by Susie Warner) one of their parlor ornaments.

Got back to Young’s at 1 o’clock and went joyfully to bed. (Twichell, 1:19–20)

Nathaniel Hawthorne’s daughter Rose (1851–1926), who had married George Parsons Lathrop in 1871, attended Howells’s party. It has not been determined which of Longfellow’s daughters, Alice Mary (1850–1928), Edith (1853–1915), or Annie Allegra (1855–1934), was present. Philosopher John Fiske (1842–1901) was at that time an assistant librarian at Harvard. Larkin G. Mead, Jr. (1835–1910), was Elinor Mead Howells’s brother; he had married Marietta di Benvenuti, of Venice, in 1866. Susan Lee Twichell was four years old (Mellow, 239, 363, 586–87; Wagenknecht, 7, 212 n. 4; Howells 1979 [bib00431], 464, 467; L4 , 238 n. 3 top). In a letter of 15 November 1874 Howells gave his father a description of Clemens on the night of the party: “I never saw a more used-up, hungrier man, than Clemens. It was something fearful to see him eat escalloped oysters” (Howells 1979 [bib01004], 76 n. 3). And in 1910, in “My Mark Twain,” he recalled:

One night, while we were giving a party, he suddenly stormed in with a friend of his and mine, Mr. Twichell, and immediately began to eat and drink of our supper, for they had come straight to our house from walking to Boston, or so great a part of the way as to be ahungered and athirst. I can see him now as he stood up in the midst of our friends, with his head thrown back, and in his hand a dish of those escalloped oysters without which no party in Cambridge was really a party, exulting in the tale of his adventure, which had abounded in the most original characters and amusing incidents at every mile of their progress. They had broken their journey with a night’s rest, and they had helped themselves lavishly out by rail in the last half; but still it had been a mighty walk to do in two days. (Howells 1968, 284)

2 

Clemens’s dinner guests at Young’s Hotel, in addition to Twichell, were Howells, Aldrich, Osgood, and Larkin G. Mead. In his journal Twichell described the party as “a rare good time which I enjoyed to the full. Heard lots of bright good talk. Mark called on me to ask a blessing which I was glad of.” Below this remark he pasted the following unidentified newspaper clipping, noting that a “short hand reporter interviewed Mark at the door during dinner with this result:”

MARK TWAIN.


HIS RECENT WALKING FEAT.


He Tells a Times Reporter All About It—The Beauty of Getting Away from Railroads—What He Intends Doing Another Year.


[written for the boston times.]

As most readers of the Times are aware, Mark Twain, known to a select circle of relatives and friends as Mr. Samuel L. Clemens, recently undertook, in company with his friend and pastor, Rev. J. H. Twitchell, to achieve pedestrian fame. He started with Mr. Twitchell from Hartford at 9 A. M. on Thursday last, intending to reach Boston by way of the old turnpike road yesterday. On Friday they hitched on to a train and reached Boston at seven o’clock in the evening, ahead of the time in which they had proposed to do the journey. Feeling certain that the public would like to know from the adventurous Twain’s own lips the details of the journey, a Times reporter called on him at Young’s Hotel, last evening, and enjoyed the following conversation with him:

Reporter—Mr. Clemens, the readers of our paper would like to learn the particulars of your journey from Hartford.

Mark Twain—Certainly, sir. We originally intended to leave Hartford on Monday morning and take a week to walk to Boston, just loafing along the road, and walking, perhaps, fifteen or eighteen miles a day, just for the sake of talking and swopping experiences, and inventing fresh ones, and simply enjoying ourselves in that way, without caring whether we saw anything or found out anything on the road or not. We were to make this journey simply for the sake of talking. But then our plan was interrupted by Mr. Twitchell having to go to a Congregational Conference of Ministers at Bridgeport, so we could not start till Thursday. We thought we would simply do two days, walking along comfortably all the time, and bringing on night just where it chose to come, and about noon, Saturday, we would get a train that would take us into Boston. We got so ambitious, however, the first day, and felt so lively that we walked twenty-eight miles.

Reporter—Did you experience any fatigue at the end of that day’s work?

Twain—Well, at the end of that day when we stopped for the night I didn’t feel fatigued, and I had no desire to go to bed, but I had a pain through my left knee which interrupted my conversation with lockjaw every now and then. The next day at twelve past five we started again, intending to do forty miles that day, believing we could still make Boston in three days. But we didn’t make the forty miles. Finding it took me three or four hours to walk seven miles, as my knee was still so stiff that it was like walking on stilts—or, if you can imagine such a thing, it was as though I had wooden legs with pains in them—we just got a team and drove to the nearest railway station, hitched on, and came up here.

Reporter—You could doubtless have accomplished the journey on foot, sir?

Twain—Oh, our experience undoubtedly demonstrates the possibility of walking. By and by, when we get an entire week to make this pedestrian excursion, we mean to make it.

Reporter—When you renew the experiment, do you intend to follow any different plan?

Twain—No, I would just follow the old Hartford and Boston stage-road of old times. It takes you through a lot of quiet, pleasant villages, away from the railroads, over a road that now has so little travel that you don’t have to be skipping out into the bushes every moment to let a wagon go by, because no wagon goes by. And then you see you can talk all you want, with nobody to listen to what you say; you can have it all to yourself, and express your opinions pretty freely.

Reporter—Were the opportunities for refreshment by the way good?

Twain—Well, I suppose pretty fair, especially if you are walking all day.

Reporter—Do you intend to lecture in Boston, now you are here?

Twain—No, not at all. I simply intend to go back home again. I shall lie over Sunday to rest, and let Mr. Twitchell have a chance to preach at Newton. You may as well say that we expect hereafter to walk up to Boston, and after we get into the habit of this sort of thing, we may extend it perhaps to New Orleans or San Francisco. Really, though, there was no intention on our part to excite anybody’s envy or make Mr. Weston feel badly, for we were not preparing for a big walk so much as for a delightful walk.

Mark was holding his napkin between his forefinger and thumb all the time, standing in the doorway of Room 9, in which a select party of his friends were impatiently awaiting his return to the table, and so our reporter abstained from asking him, as he intended and ought to have done, as to whether a bottle-holder would not be a good feature in his next trip and various other important queries. Thanking him he accordingly withdrew. (Twichell, 1:21–23, including the clipping transcribed here, which was probably from the Boston Times of 16 Nov 74)

From Monday, 9 November, through Wednesday, 11 November, Twichell had attended the annual meeting of the general conference of the Congregational churches of Connecticut in Bridgeport. On Sunday, 15 November, he walked nine miles from Boston to Newton Highlands, where he preached “both forenoon and evening” and then stayed overnight at the home of the local pastor, the Reverend S. H. Dana. Edward Payson Weston was a well-known long-distance walker (Twichell, 1:12, 23–24; “Congregational Conference,” Hartford Courant, 10 Nov 74, 2; L3 , 469 n. 8).

3 

On Monday, 16 November—at the invitation of a staff member of the Boston Advertiser, probably Walter Allen—Clemens, Twichell, and a Boston friend of Twichell’s, clergyman Frederick B. Allen, attended an eleven a.m. meeting of the Radical Club. This informal association of Unitarian and Transcendental ministers and laymen gathered at 13 Chestnut Street, the home of the Reverend John T. Sargent. The speaker that morning was Edward S. Morse (1838–1925), a professor of zoology and comparative anatomy at Bowdoin College, who gave, Twichell noted in his journal, “a very interesting lecture on Evolution.” It was probably Twichell, in a letter to Sargent or his wife, who gave this account of his and Clemens’s departure after the lecture:

“As we passed out,” he writes, “Mr. A. joined the party, and while the rest of us were chatting briskly about the incidents of the meeting, Mr. Clemens was silent until we got up into Beacon Street, when he spoke out in a serious way, saying, as nearly as I can recall his language: ‘Well, that was an extraordinary meeting! How that chap did draw on the blackboard! I never saw anything like that. I’m sorry we had to come away, for I was mightily interested in the talk going on, and wanted to say something myself. When Mrs. Sargent asked me if I would speak, I did n’t want to do it at all, but I thought it would n’t be polite to decline. I did n’t care much about evolution, but when they struck the doctrine of metempsychosis, I got interested. That doctrine accounts for me: I knew there was something the matter, but never knew what it was before. It’s the passing off on a man of an old, damaged, second-hand soul that makes all the trouble.’” (Sargent, 187)

According to Twichell’s journal, they then went

to Howells at 2 o’clock to lunch—disgracefully tardy—a most delightful afternoon. Late in the afternoon called on Prof. Lowell with Howells, and staid a half-hour, which was mostly occupied with talk about Beecher. Lowell looked much as I had expected him to.

But Dr. Holmes, to whom Mark introduced me on the street Saturday, looked older than I had imagined.

We left Howells’ finally at 6 o’clock—looked at Harvard Memorial Hall during the tea hour, (Howells going so far with us) then back to Boston and by the 9 o’clock train to Hartford after on some accounts the most pleasant experience of my life. (Twichell, 1:24–26)

The “talk about Beecher” doubtless concerned his alleged adultery with Elizabeth Tilton (see 29? July 74 to Twichell, n. 2click to open letter). Clemens and Twichell reached Hartford at midnight (Hart 1983, 623; Boston Directory 1874, 66, 67, 805, 1016).

4 

Clemens wrote this letter on a small card probably intended to accompany the enclosed “hakky” (“hanky,” as pronounced by Susy), which does not survive.

5 

The letter from Olivia is not known to survive.

Top