CHAPTER 44
My salary was increased to forty dollars a weekⒺexplanatory note. But I seldom drew it. I had plenty of other resources, and what were two broad twenty-dollar gold pieces to a man who had his pockets full of such and a cumbersome abundance of bright half dollars besides? [Paper money has never come into use on the Pacific coast.] Reporting was lucrative, and every man in the town was lavish with his money and his “feet.” The city and all the great mountain side were riddled with mining shafts. There were more mines than miners. True, not ten of these mines were yielding rock worth hauling to a mill, but everybody said, “Wait till the shaft gets down where the ledge comes in solid, and then you will see!” So nobody was discouraged. These were nearly all “wild cat” mines, and wholly worthless, but nobody believed it then. The “Ophir,” the “Gould & Curry,” the “Mexican,” and other great mines on the Comstock lead in Virginia and Gold Hill were turning out huge piles of rich rock every day, and every man believed that his little wild cat claim was as good as any on the “main lead” and would infallibly be worth a thousand dollars a foot when he “got down where it came in solid.” Poor fellow, he was blessedly blind to the fact that he never would see that day. So the thousand wild cat shafts burrowed deeper and deeper into the earth day by day, and all men were beside themselves with hope and happiness. How they labored, prophesied, exulted! Surely nothing like it was ever seen before since the world began. Every one of these wild cat mines—not mines, but holes in the ground over imaginary mines—was incorporated and had handsomely engraved “stock” and the stock was salable, too. It was bought and sold with a feverish avidity in the boards every day. You could go up on the mountain side, scratch around and find a ledge (there was no lack of [begin page 286] them), put up a “notice” with a grandiloquent name in it, start a shaft, get your stock printed, and with nothing whatever to prove that your mine was worth a straw, you could put your stock on the market and sell out for hundreds and even thousands of dollars. To make money, and make it fast, was as easy as it was to eat your dinner. Every man owned “feet” in fifty different wild cat mines and considered his fortune made. Think of a city with not one solitary poor man in it! One would suppose that when month after month went by and still not a wild cat mine (byⒶemendation wild cat I mean, in general terms, any claim not located on the mother vein, i. e., the “Comstock”) yielded a ton of rock worth crushing, the people would begin to wonder if they were not putting too much faith in their prospective riches; but there was not a thought of such a thing. They burrowed away, bought and sold, and were happy.
New claims were taken up daily, and it was the friendly custom to run straight to the newspaper offices, give the reportersⒶemendation forty or fifty “feet,” and get them to go and examine the mine and publish [begin page 287] a notice of itⒺexplanatory note. They did not care a fig what you said about the property so you said something. Consequently we generally said a word or two to the effect that the “indications” were good, or that the ledge was “six feet wide,” or that the rock “resembled the Comstock” (and so it did—but as a general thing the resemblance was not startling enough to knock you down). If the rock was moderately promising, we followed the custom of the country, used strong adjectives and frothed at the mouth as if a very marvel in silver discoveries had transpired. If the mine was a “developed” one, and had no pay ore to show (and of course it hadn’t), we praised the tunnel; said it was one of the most infatuating tunnels in the land; driveled and driveled about the tunnel till we ran entirely out of ecstasies—but never said a word about the rock. We would squander half a column of adulation on a shaft, or a new wire rope, or a dressed pine windlass, or a fascinating force pump, and close with a burst of admiration of the “gentlemanly and efficient Superintendent” of the mine—but never utter a whisper about the rock. And those people were always pleased, always satisfied. Occasionally we patched up and varnished our reputation for discrimination and stern, undeviating accuracy, by giving some old abandoned claim a blast that ought to have made its dry bones rattle—and then somebody would seize it and sell it on the fleeting notoriety thus conferred upon it.
There was nothing in the shape of a mining claim that was not salable. We received presents of “feet” every dayⒺexplanatory note. If we needed a hundred dollars or so, we sold some; if not, we hoarded it away, satisfied that it would ultimately be worth a thousand dollars a foot. I had a trunk about half full of “stock.” When a claim made a stir in the market and went up to a high figure, I searched through my pile to see if I had any of its stock—and generally found it.
The prices rose and fell constantly; but still a fall disturbed us little, because a thousand dollars a foot was our figure, and so we were content to let it fluctuate as much as it pleased till it reached it. My pile of stock was not all given to me by people who wished their claims “noticed.” At least half of it was given me by persons who had no thought of such a thing, and looked for nothing more than a simple verbal “thank you;” and you were not even obliged by law to furnish that. If you are coming up the street with a couple [begin page 288] of baskets of apples in your hands, and you meet a friend, you naturally invite him to take a few. That describes the condition of
To show what a wild spirit possessed the mining brain of the community, I will remark that “claims” were actually “located” in excavations for cellars, where the pick had exposed what seemed to be quartz veins—and not cellars in the suburbs, either, but in the very heart of the city; and forthwith stock would be issued and thrown on the market. It was small matter who the cellar belonged to—the “ledge” belonged to the finder, and unless the U. S.Ⓐemendation government interfered (inasmuch as the government holds the primary right to mines of the noble metals in Nevada—or at least did thenⒺexplanatory note), it was considered to be his privilege to work it. Imagine a stranger staking out a mining claim among the costly shrubbery in your front yardⒺexplanatory note and calmly proceeding to lay waste the ground with pick and shovel and blasting powder! It has been often done in California. In the middle of one of the principal business streets of Virginia, a man “located” a mining claim and began a shaft on it. He gave me a hundred feet of the stock and I sold it for a fine suit of clothes because I was afraid somebody would fall down the shaft and sue for damages. I owned in another claim that was located in the middle of another street; and to show how absurd people can be, that “East India” stock (as it was called) sold briskly although there was an ancient tunnel running directly under the claim and any man could go into it and see that it did not cut a quartz ledge or anything that remotely resembled oneⒺexplanatory note.
One plan of acquiring sudden wealth was to “salt” a wild cat claim and sell out while the excitement was up. The process was
[begin page 290]simple. The schemer located a worthless ledge, sunk a shaft on it, bought a wagon load of rich “Comstock” ore, dumped a portion of it into the shaft and piled the rest by its side, above ground. Then he showed the property to a simpleton and sold it to him at a high figure. Of course the wagon load of rich ore was all that the victim ever got out of his purchase. A most remarkable case of “salting” was that of the “North Ophir.” It was claimed that this vein was a remote “extension” of the original “Ophir,” a valuable mine on the “Comstock.” For a few days everybody was talking about the rich developments in the North Ophir. It was said that it yielded perfectly pure silver in small, solid lumps. I went to the place with the owners, and found a shaft six or eight feet deep, in the bottom of which was a badly shattered vein of dull, yellowish, unpromising rock. One would as soon expect to find silver in a grindstone. We got out a pan of the rubbish and washed it in a puddle, and sure enough, among the sediment we found half a dozen black, bullet-looking pellets of unimpeachable “native” silver. Nobody had ever [begin page 291] heard of such a thing before; science could not account for such a queer novelty. The stock rose to sixty-five dollars a foot, and at this figure the world-renowned tragedian, McKean Buchanan, bought a commanding interest and prepared to quit the stage once more—he was always doing that. And then it transpired that the mine had been “salted”—and not in any hackneyed way, either, but in a singularly bold, barefaced and peculiarly original and outrageous fashion. On one of the lumps of “native” silver was discovered the minted legend, “ted States of,” and then it was plainly apparent that the mine had been “salted” with melted half dollarsⒺexplanatory note Ⓐemendation! The lumps thus obtained had been blackened till they resembled native silver, and were then mixed with the shattered rock in the bottom of the shaft. It is literally true. Of course the price of the stock at once fell to nothing, and the tragedian was ruined. But for this calamity we might have lost McKean Buchanan from the stageⒺexplanatory note.
he would give me twenty feet of “Justis” stock . . . nothing could make that man yield] The Justis (sometimes spelled “Justice”) mine, located in 1859, was in the Gold Hill district on the west side of Gold Canyon, conveniently situated near the main road and several mills. In mid-November 1863 Justis stock was hovering in the range of $10 a foot; on 11 December it had reached $70. By mid-February 1864, following a rich strike earlier that month, the price had risen to over $150 a foot (Lamb, 2; Virginia City Union: “Rich Strike,” 10 Feb 64, 3; “Justice Company,” 27 Mar 64, 3; “Washoe Stock and Exchange Board,” Virginia City Evening Bulletin, various dates in Nov 63–Feb 64). Mark Twain gave a similar account of Stewart’s offer in his letter to the Enterprise of 12 December 1863, taking the opportunity to launch an attack on the “disreputable old cottonhead”:
Stewart as good as promised me ten feet in the “Justis,” and then backed down again when the stock went up to $80 a foot . . . . Bill Stewart is always construing something—eternally distorting facts and principles. He would climb out of his coffin and construe the burial service. He is a long-legged, bull-headed, whopper-jawed, constructionary monomaniac . . . . I have my own opinion of Bill Stewart, and if it would not appear as if I were a little put out about that Justis (that was an almighty mean thing), I would as soon express it as not. (SLC 1863y)
My revenge will be found in the accompanying portrait] See the illustration on page 289. According to Stewart, Clemens exacted this “revenge” for quite another offense, dating from the winter of 1867–68. Stewart employed Clemens then as his private secretary and shared lodgings with him in Washington, D.C., an arrangement that allowed Clemens to begin work on his manuscript for The Innocents Abroad. Reportedly Clemens’s irregular and obtrusive living habits so bedeviled their elderly landlady that Stewart was forced to call him to account. “I called Sam in and repeated to him what the landlady had said,” Stewart recalled in 1891,
I told him I would thrash him if I ever heard another complaint. I said that I did not want to turn him out because I wanted him to finish his book. He made one of his smart replies at the expense of the landlady and I told him that I would thrash him then and there. He begged in a most pitiful way for me not to do so and I could not help laughing.
Seeing that he had gotten me into a good humor again he said that he would not annoy the old woman again, but that he would certainly get even with me for having threatened to thrash him if it took him 10 years to do so. (“Mark Twain’s Revenge,” New York Recorder, 5 Apr 91, clipping enclosed in Robert W. Carl to SLC, 5 Apr 91, CU-MARK)
[begin page 655] In his autobiography, published in 1908, Stewart told substantially the same story, adding, “I was confident that he would come to no good end, but I have heard of him from time to time since then, and I understand that he has settled down and become respectable” (William M. Stewart, 224). Albert Bigelow Paine maintained that this mildly provocative portrait (which does not particularly resemble Stewart, who had a distinctive flowing beard) was an “unforgivable offense to Stewart’s dignity,” which rankled long after and influenced Stewart’s unflattering—and at times untruthful—recollections of Clemens ( MTB , 1:347 n. 1). But Clemens’s friend Steve Gillis believed that Stewart’s “malicious stories” were not the result of any real offense. In a letter to Paine, Gillis transmitted Joseph Goodman’s remarks “about that Stewart fling”:
“If Mark didn’t see fit to come back at the Senator, why should Paine take up the cudgel now? I have always thought that Stewart considered that attack a masterpiece of humor, and that his object was to draw Mark into a controversy and thereby attract attention to his (Stewart’s) book.” . . .
There you have Stewart’s animus in a nutshell. (Gillis to Paine, 26 Feb 1911, Daley)
they had been buying “Overman” stock . . . These are actual facts] Between March and August 1863, the value of stock in the Overman mine, in the Gold Hill district, increased from $12 to over $600 a foot (Mining and Scientific Press: “Washoe Stock Remarks,” 6 [23 Mar 63]: 5; “The Mining Share Market,” 6 [31 Aug 63]: 4). In a letter written to his family on 18 July 1863, shortly after returning to Virginia City from a visit to San Francisco, Clemens gave a slightly different account of this failed opportunity:
A gentleman in San Francisco told me to call at his office, & he would give me five feet of “Overman.” Well, do you know I never went after it? The stock is worth $40000 a foot, now—$2,000 thrown away. I don’t care a straw, for myself, but I ought to have had more thought for you. ( L1 , 260)
The value of the stock on 16 July was in fact $400 a foot ( L1 , 261 n. 2).
I owned in another claim . . . “East India” stock . . . did not cut a quartz ledge or anything that remotely resembled one] Clemens wrote to his family in April 1863:
Some of the boys made me a present of fifty feet in the East India G & S. M. Company, ten days ago. I was offered ninety-five dollars a foot for it, yesterday, in gold. I refused it—not because I think the claim is worth a cent, for I don’t, but because I had a curiosity to see how high it would go, before people find out how worthless it is. ( L1 , 247)
The East India “humbug,” Clemens later noted, was located “right in the middle of C. street” (SLC 1868e).
the world-renowned tragedian, McKean Buchanan . . . we might have lost . . . from the stage] According to the Virginia City Evening Bulletin of 6 July 1863, a “prominent theatrical man” (presumably Buchanan) purchased a block of North Ophir stock for less than $10 a foot, sold out for $30, and then the next day bought it back for $60, believing it would rise still further (“Fluctuations of North Ophir,” 2). Instead, he lost everything when the stock collapsed. McKean Buchanan (1823–72) abandoned a lucrative mercantile career to pursue his theatrical ambitions after making a decided hit as an amateur in New Orleans. He made his New York debut in 1849 and toured extensively over the succeeding years, appearing in California, Great Britain, and Australia. He and his company toured Nevada in 1862—meeting with little success—and returned in May 1863 for an extended engagement in Virginia City. Buchanan had an established reputation as a tragedian, although his overblown, bombastic style did not endear him to the critics. Mark Twain himself remarked in 1869 in the Buffalo Express:
The great McKean Buchanan having been driven from all the world’s great cities many years ago, still keeps up a pitiless persecution of the provinces, ranting with undiminished fury before audiences composed of one sad manager, one malignant reporter, and a Sheriff waiting to collect the license, and still pushes his crusade from village to village, strewing his disastrous wake with the corpses of country theatres. (SLC 1869f)
And upon Buchanan’s death, the New York Times commented that many of his “warm personal friends . . . regretted his persistence in continuing on the dramatic stage” (“Obituary. McKean Buchanan,” 18 Apr 72, 2; Odell, 5:444–45, 7:3; “McKean Buchanan’s Death—Biographical Sketch of the Noted Actor,” Denver Rocky Mountain News, 17 Apr 72, 1; Rambler, 1; Watson, 91–94, 125–26, 145).