Explanatory Notes
See Headnote
Apparatus Notes
See Headnotes
CHAPTER 44
[begin page 285]

CHAPTER 44

My salary was increased to forty dollars a weekexplanatory note. But I seldom drew it. I had plenty of other resources, and what were two broad twenty-dollar gold pieces to a man who had his pockets full of such and a cumbersome abundance of bright half dollars besides? [Paper money has never come into use on the Pacific coast.] Reporting was lucrative, and every man in the town was lavish with his money and his “feet.” The city and all the great mountain side were riddled with mining shafts. There were more mines than miners. True, not ten of these mines were yielding rock worth hauling to a mill, but everybody said, “Wait till the shaft gets down where the ledge comes in solid, and then you will see!” So nobody was discouraged. These were nearly all “wild cat” mines, and wholly worthless, but nobody believed it then. The “Ophir,” the “Gould & Curry,” the “Mexican,” and other great mines on the Comstock lead in Virginia and Gold Hill were turning out huge piles of rich rock every day, and every man believed that his little wild cat claim was as good as any on the “main lead” and would infallibly be worth a thousand dollars a foot when he “got down where it came in solid.” Poor fellow, he was blessedly blind to the fact that he never would see that day. So the thousand wild cat shafts burrowed deeper and deeper into the earth day by day, and all men were beside themselves with hope and happiness. How they labored, prophesied, exulted! Surely nothing like it was ever seen before since the world began. Every one of these wild cat mines—not mines, but holes in the ground over imaginary mines—was incorporated and had handsomely engraved “stock” and the stock was salable, too. It was bought and sold with a feverish avidity in the boards every day. You could go up on the mountain side, scratch around and find a ledge (there was no lack of [begin page 286] them), put up a “notice” with a grandiloquent name in it, start a shaft, get your stock printed, and with nothing whatever to prove that your mine was worth a straw, you could put your stock on the market and sell out for hundreds and even thousands of dollars. To make money, and make it fast, was as easy as it was to eat your dinner. Every man owned “feet” in fifty different wild cat mines and considered his fortune made. Think of a city with not one solitary poor man in it! One would suppose that when month after month went by and still not a wild cat mine (byemendation wild cat I mean, in general terms, any claim not located on the mother vein, i. e., the “Comstock”) yielded a ton of rock worth crushing, the people would begin to wonder if they were not putting too much faith in their prospective riches; but there was not a thought of such a thing. They burrowed away, bought and sold, and were happy.

a new mine.

New claims were taken up daily, and it was the friendly custom to run straight to the newspaper offices, give the reportersemendation forty or fifty “feet,” and get them to go and examine the mine and publish [begin page 287] a notice of itexplanatory note. They did not care a fig what you said about the property so you said something. Consequently we generally said a word or two to the effect that the “indications” were good, or that the ledge was “six feet wide,” or that the rock “resembled the Comstock” (and so it did—but as a general thing the resemblance was not startling enough to knock you down). If the rock was moderately promising, we followed the custom of the country, used strong adjectives and frothed at the mouth as if a very marvel in silver discoveries had transpired. If the mine was a “developed” one, and had no pay ore to show (and of course it hadn’t), we praised the tunnel; said it was one of the most infatuating tunnels in the land; driveled and driveled about the tunnel till we ran entirely out of ecstasies—but never said a word about the rock. We would squander half a column of adulation on a shaft, or a new wire rope, or a dressed pine windlass, or a fascinating force pump, and close with a burst of admiration of the “gentlemanly and efficient Superintendent” of the mine—but never utter a whisper about the rock. And those people were always pleased, always satisfied. Occasionally we patched up and varnished our reputation for discrimination and stern, undeviating accuracy, by giving some old abandoned claim a blast that ought to have made its dry bones rattle—and then somebody would seize it and sell it on the fleeting notoriety thus conferred upon it.

There was nothing in the shape of a mining claim that was not salable. We received presents of “feet” every dayexplanatory note. If we needed a hundred dollars or so, we sold some; if not, we hoarded it away, satisfied that it would ultimately be worth a thousand dollars a foot. I had a trunk about half full of “stock.” When a claim made a stir in the market and went up to a high figure, I searched through my pile to see if I had any of its stock—and generally found it.

The prices rose and fell constantly; but still a fall disturbed us little, because a thousand dollars a foot was our figure, and so we were content to let it fluctuate as much as it pleased till it reached it. My pile of stock was not all given to me by people who wished their claims “noticed.” At least half of it was given me by persons who had no thought of such a thing, and looked for nothing more than a simple verbal “thank you;” and you were not even obliged by law to furnish that. If you are coming up the street with a couple [begin page 288] of baskets of apples in your hands, and you meet a friend, you naturally invite him to take a few. That describes the condition of

take emendation a few?
things in Virginia in the “flush times.” Every man had his pockets full of stock, and it was the actual custom of the country to part with small quantities of it to friends without the asking. Very often it was a good idea to close the transaction instantly, when a man offered a stock present to a friend, for the offer was only good and binding at that moment, and if the price went to a high figure shortly afterward the procrastination was a thing to be regretted. Mr. Stewart (Senator, now, from Nevada)explanatory note one day told me he would give me twenty feet of “Justis” stock if I would walk over to his office. It was worth five or ten dollars a foot. I asked him to make the offer good for next day, as I was just going to dinner. He said he would not be in town; so I risked it and took my dinner instead of the stock. Within the week the price went up to seventy dollars and afterward to a hundred and fifty, but nothing could make that man yieldexplanatory note. I suppose he sold that stock of mine and placed the guilty proceeds in his own pocket. [My revenge will be found in the accompanying portraitexplanatory note.] I met three friends one afternoon, who said they had been buying “Overman” stock at auction at eight dollars a foot. One said if I would come up to his office he would give me fifteen feet; another said he would add fifteen; the third said he would do the same. But I was going after an inquest and could not stop. A few weeks afterward they sold all their “Overman” at six hundred dollars a foot and generously came around to tell me about it—and also to urge me to accept of the next forty-five feet of it that people tried to force on me. These are actual factsexplanatory note, and I could make the list a long one and still confine [begin page 289] myself strictly to the truth. Many a time friends gave us as much as twenty-five feet of stock that was selling at twenty-five dollars a foot, and they thought no more of it than they would of offering a guest a cigar. These were “flush times” indeed! I thought they were
portrait of mr. stewart.
going to last always, but somehow I never was much of a prophet.

To show what a wild spirit possessed the mining brain of the community, I will remark that “claims” were actually “located” in excavations for cellars, where the pick had exposed what seemed to be quartz veins—and not cellars in the suburbs, either, but in the very heart of the city; and forthwith stock would be issued and thrown on the market. It was small matter who the cellar belonged to—the “ledge” belonged to the finder, and unless the U. S.emendation government interfered (inasmuch as the government holds the primary right to mines of the noble metals in Nevada—or at least did thenexplanatory note), it was considered to be his privilege to work it. Imagine a stranger staking out a mining claim among the costly shrubbery in your front yardexplanatory note and calmly proceeding to lay waste the ground with pick and shovel and blasting powder! It has been often done in California. In the middle of one of the principal business streets of Virginia, a man “located” a mining claim and began a shaft on it. He gave me a hundred feet of the stock and I sold it for a fine suit of clothes because I was afraid somebody would fall down the shaft and sue for damages. I owned in another claim that was located in the middle of another street; and to show how absurd people can be, that “East India” stock (as it was called) sold briskly although there was an ancient tunnel running directly under the claim and any man could go into it and see that it did not cut a quartz ledge or anything that remotely resembled oneexplanatory note.

One plan of acquiring sudden wealth was to “salt” a wild cat claim and sell out while the excitement was up. The process was

[begin page 290]
selling a mine.

simple. The schemer located a worthless ledge, sunk a shaft on it, bought a wagon load of rich “Comstock” ore, dumped a portion of it into the shaft and piled the rest by its side, above ground. Then he showed the property to a simpleton and sold it to him at a high figure. Of course the wagon load of rich ore was all that the victim ever got out of his purchase. A most remarkable case of “salting” was that of the “North Ophir.” It was claimed that this vein was a remote “extension” of the original “Ophir,” a valuable mine on the “Comstock.” For a few days everybody was talking about the rich developments in the North Ophir. It was said that it yielded perfectly pure silver in small, solid lumps. I went to the place with the owners, and found a shaft six or eight feet deep, in the bottom of which was a badly shattered vein of dull, yellowish, unpromising rock. One would as soon expect to find silver in a grindstone. We got out a pan of the rubbish and washed it in a puddle, and sure enough, among the sediment we found half a dozen black, bullet-looking pellets of unimpeachable “native” silver. Nobody had ever [begin page 291] heard of such a thing before; science could not account for such a queer novelty. The stock rose to sixty-five dollars a foot, and at this figure the world-renowned tragedian, McKean Buchanan, bought a commanding interest and prepared to quit the stage once more—he was always doing that. And then it transpired that the mine had been “salted”—and not in any hackneyed way, either, but in a singularly bold, barefaced and peculiarly original and outrageous fashion. On one of the lumps of “native” silver was discovered the minted legend, “ted States of,” and then it was plainly apparent that the mine had been “salted” with melted half dollarsexplanatory note emendation! The lumps thus obtained had been blackened till they resembled native silver, and were then mixed with the shattered rock in the bottom of the shaft. It is literally true. Of course the price of the stock at once fell to nothing, and the tragedian was ruined. But for this calamity we might have lost McKean Buchanan from the stageexplanatory note.

Editorial Emendations CHAPTER 44
  (by (C)  •  [by (A) 
  reporters (C)  •  reporter (A) 
  take  (C)  •  try  (A) 
  U. S. (C)  •  United States (A) 
  half dollars (C)  •  half-dollars (A) 
Explanatory Notes CHAPTER 44
  My salary was increased to forty dollars a week] This salary, Clemens later confessed, was “all of forty dollars more than I was worth, and I had always wanted a position which paid in the opposite proportion of value to amount of work” (AD, 9 Jan 1906, CU-MARK, in MTA , 1:271).
 give the reporters forty or fifty “feet,” and get them to . . . publish a notice of it] Clemens, for example, made favorable mention of the Echo mine, in which he was a shareholder, in three letters to the San Francisco Morning Call in July and August 1863. In the first of them he went so far as to claim that the Echo was “probably the richest mine in Gold Hill District” (SLC 1863f, 1863i, 1863l ; L1 , 258–59 n. 1).
 We received presents of “feet” every day] Fully realizing the extent to which his reports affected the value of mining stock, Clemens learned, as he wrote home, “how to levy black-mail on the mining companies” in exchange for shares of stock ( L1 , 253). When his mother later inquired how he supported his extravagant living in San Francisco during May and June 1863, he answered, “Why I sold ‘wildcat’ mining ground that was given me, & my credit was always good at the bank for two or three thousand dollars, & is yet” ( L1 , 259–60).
 Mr. Stewart (Senator, now, from Nevada)] William M. Stewart (1827?–1909), originally from New York, had emigrated to California in 1850; he practiced law and served as state attorney general before relocating to Nevada in 1860. There he invested in mining properties [begin page 654] and maintained a highly lucrative law practice, earning immense fees for representing several of the largest mining companies. He was a member of the Territorial Council in 1861 and a delegate to the constitutional convention of 1863. When Nevada achieved statehood, Stewart was elected one of its first senators, serving from 1864 to 1875 and again from 1887 to 1905 ( L1 , 243 n. 4; Elliott, 4–5, 11, 17–26, 277 n. 1).
 

he would give me twenty feet of “Justis” stock . . . nothing could make that man yield] The Justis (sometimes spelled “Justice”) mine, located in 1859, was in the Gold Hill district on the west side of Gold Canyon, conveniently situated near the main road and several mills. In mid-November 1863 Justis stock was hovering in the range of $10 a foot; on 11 December it had reached $70. By mid-February 1864, following a rich strike earlier that month, the price had risen to over $150 a foot (Lamb, 2; Virginia City Union: “Rich Strike,” 10 Feb 64, 3; “Justice Company,” 27 Mar 64, 3; “Washoe Stock and Exchange Board,” Virginia City Evening Bulletin, various dates in Nov 63–Feb 64). Mark Twain gave a similar account of Stewart’s offer in his letter to the Enterprise of 12 December 1863, taking the opportunity to launch an attack on the “disreputable old cottonhead”:

Stewart as good as promised me ten feet in the “Justis,” and then backed down again when the stock went up to $80 a foot . . . . Bill Stewart is always construing something—eternally distorting facts and principles. He would climb out of his coffin and construe the burial service. He is a long-legged, bull-headed, whopper-jawed, constructionary monomaniac . . . . I have my own opinion of Bill Stewart, and if it would not appear as if I were a little put out about that Justis (that was an almighty mean thing), I would as soon express it as not. (SLC 1863y)

 

My revenge will be found in the accompanying portrait] See the illustration on page 289. According to Stewart, Clemens exacted this “revenge” for quite another offense, dating from the winter of 1867–68. Stewart employed Clemens then as his private secretary and shared lodgings with him in Washington, D.C., an arrangement that allowed Clemens to begin work on his manuscript for The Innocents Abroad. Reportedly Clemens’s irregular and obtrusive living habits so bedeviled their elderly landlady that Stewart was forced to call him to account. “I called Sam in and repeated to him what the landlady had said,” Stewart recalled in 1891,

I told him I would thrash him if I ever heard another complaint. I said that I did not want to turn him out because I wanted him to finish his book. He made one of his smart replies at the expense of the landlady and I told him that I would thrash him then and there. He begged in a most pitiful way for me not to do so and I could not help laughing.

Seeing that he had gotten me into a good humor again he said that he would not annoy the old woman again, but that he would certainly get even with me for having threatened to thrash him if it took him 10 years to do so. (“Mark Twain’s Revenge,” New York Recorder, 5 Apr 91, clipping enclosed in Robert W. Carl to SLC, 5 Apr 91, CU-MARK)

[begin page 655] In his autobiography, published in 1908, Stewart told substantially the same story, adding, “I was confident that he would come to no good end, but I have heard of him from time to time since then, and I understand that he has settled down and become respectable” (William M. Stewart, 224). Albert Bigelow Paine maintained that this mildly provocative portrait (which does not particularly resemble Stewart, who had a distinctive flowing beard) was an “unforgivable offense to Stewart’s dignity,” which rankled long after and influenced Stewart’s unflattering—and at times untruthful—recollections of Clemens ( MTB , 1:347 n. 1). But Clemens’s friend Steve Gillis believed that Stewart’s “malicious stories” were not the result of any real offense. In a letter to Paine, Gillis transmitted Joseph Goodman’s remarks “about that Stewart fling”:

“If Mark didn’t see fit to come back at the Senator, why should Paine take up the cudgel now? I have always thought that Stewart considered that attack a masterpiece of humor, and that his object was to draw Mark into a controversy and thereby attract attention to his (Stewart’s) book.” . . .

There you have Stewart’s animus in a nutshell. (Gillis to Paine, 26 Feb 1911, Daley)

 

they had been buying “Overman” stock . . . These are actual facts] Between March and August 1863, the value of stock in the Overman mine, in the Gold Hill district, increased from $12 to over $600 a foot (Mining and Scientific Press: “Washoe Stock Remarks,” 6 [23 Mar 63]: 5; “The Mining Share Market,” 6 [31 Aug 63]: 4). In a letter written to his family on 18 July 1863, shortly after returning to Virginia City from a visit to San Francisco, Clemens gave a slightly different account of this failed opportunity:

A gentleman in San Francisco told me to call at his office, & he would give me five feet of “Overman.” Well, do you know I never went after it? The stock is worth $40000 a foot, now—$2,000 thrown away. I don’t care a straw, for myself, but I ought to have had more thought for you. ( L1 , 260)

The value of the stock on 16 July was in fact $400 a foot ( L1 , 261 n. 2).

 the government holds the primary right to mines . . . or at least did then] In the early 1860s there were no national laws regulating mining claims, nor any way to acquire legal title to claims located on public lands. By long-established custom, however, the rights of “squatter sovereignty” prevailed, and miners observed the laws set forth by each mining district. The National Mining Law of 1866, sponsored by Senator Stewart, gave legal status to local regulations and provided for the patenting of mining claims at a fee of five dollars per acre (Elliott, 49–55).
 Imagine a stranger staking out a mining claim . . . in your front yard] The conflicting rights of “owners of gold and silver ledges lying under the earth, and the owners of lots lying on the top of the earth” were a topic of lively discussion in Nevada and California newspapers [begin page 656] in 1863 and 1864 (“The Conflict in Washoe between Mining Claims and Surface Lots,” San Francisco Evening Bulletin, 30 Apr 63, 3). The principle that “no surface location of ground on mineral land can be made to the exclusion of mining interests” prevailed in the courts, although owners of condemned houses, crops, or other improvements were entitled to compensation (San Francisco Evening Bulletin: “Further of the Conflict of Surface and Ledge Interests at Washoe,” 5 May 63, 2; “Mining Companies vs. Lot Owners in Washoe,” 7 Sept 63, 2). Mark Twain took note of this conflict of interests in “A Big Thing,” published in the Buffalo Express in March 1870: “When you have ‘taken up’ a mine you have a legal right to dig for it,—and if another man owns the farm that is on top of it, it is a very grave misfortune for him, because the only way he has of protecting that farm from destruction, is to move it” (SLC 1870d).
 

I owned in another claim . . . “East India” stock . . . did not cut a quartz ledge or anything that remotely resembled one] Clemens wrote to his family in April 1863:

Some of the boys made me a present of fifty feet in the East India G & S. M. Company, ten days ago. I was offered ninety-five dollars a foot for it, yesterday, in gold. I refused it—not because I think the claim is worth a cent, for I don’t, but because I had a curiosity to see how high it would go, before people find out how worthless it is. ( L1 , 247)

The East India “humbug,” Clemens later noted, was located “right in the middle of C. street” (SLC 1868e).

 “North Ophir.” . . . the mine had been “salted” with melted half dollars] The North Ophir was southwest of Virginia City in the Argentine district. It first attracted attention in March 1863, but its shares were not actively traded until a sudden “excitement” in the stock in early July sent prices soaring from below $10 up to $60 a foot. On 6 July, however, the Virginia City Evening Bulletin reported that “one individual who had some rock assayed and found silver alloyed with copper, swears that somebody melted a lot of half dollars and poured them into the ledge” (“Fluctuations of North Ophir,” 6 July 63, 2). In spite of this accusation, Clemens puffed the mine in mid-July in exchange for five feet, claiming that expert testimony had “removed the stain from the North Ophir’s character” (SLC 1863i). Years later he admitted that he had “bought that mine,” and then “adjourned to the poor-house again” when a “painful case of ‘salting’ was apparent” (SLC 1869j). In an ironic conclusion to the hoax, the Virginia City correspondent of the San Francisco Evening Bulletin maintained in October 1863 that the “salting” conspirators had taken care to “preserve small portions of the milling of the coin, which on being detected would at once disclose the artifice,” thereby depressing the value of the stock and permitting them to purchase it at cheap prices (“Review of Things in Washoe,” San Francisco Evening Bulletin, 14 Oct 63, 1; “Struck It [begin page 657] Rich,” Sacramento Union, 9 Mar 63, 1, reprinting an item possibly by Clemens in the Virginia City Territorial Enterprise of 6 March; L1 , 260, 260–61 n. 1).
 

the world-renowned tragedian, McKean Buchanan . . . we might have lost . . . from the stage] According to the Virginia City Evening Bulletin of 6 July 1863, a “prominent theatrical man” (presumably Buchanan) purchased a block of North Ophir stock for less than $10 a foot, sold out for $30, and then the next day bought it back for $60, believing it would rise still further (“Fluctuations of North Ophir,” 2). Instead, he lost everything when the stock collapsed. McKean Buchanan (1823–72) abandoned a lucrative mercantile career to pursue his theatrical ambitions after making a decided hit as an amateur in New Orleans. He made his New York debut in 1849 and toured extensively over the succeeding years, appearing in California, Great Britain, and Australia. He and his company toured Nevada in 1862—meeting with little success—and returned in May 1863 for an extended engagement in Virginia City. Buchanan had an established reputation as a tragedian, although his overblown, bombastic style did not endear him to the critics. Mark Twain himself remarked in 1869 in the Buffalo Express:

The great McKean Buchanan having been driven from all the world’s great cities many years ago, still keeps up a pitiless persecution of the provinces, ranting with undiminished fury before audiences composed of one sad manager, one malignant reporter, and a Sheriff waiting to collect the license, and still pushes his crusade from village to village, strewing his disastrous wake with the corpses of country theatres. (SLC 1869f)

And upon Buchanan’s death, the New York Times commented that many of his “warm personal friends . . . regretted his persistence in continuing on the dramatic stage” (“Obituary. McKean Buchanan,” 18 Apr 72, 2; Odell, 5:444–45, 7:3; “McKean Buchanan’s Death—Biographical Sketch of the Noted Actor,” Denver Rocky Mountain News, 17 Apr 72, 1; Rambler, 1; Watson, 91–94, 125–26, 145).