Explanatory Notes
See Headnote
Apparatus Notes
See Headnotes
NOTES

[begin page 337]

Note 1alteration in the MS.—Page 68.

Christ’s Hospital Costume.

It is mostalteration in the MS reasonable to regardalteration in the MS the dress as copied from the costume of the citizens of London of that period, when long blue coats were the common habit of apprentices and serving-men, and yellow stockings were generally worn; the coat fits closely to the body, but has loose sleeves, and beneath is worn a sleeveless yellow under-coat; around the waist is a red leathern girdle; a clerical band roundhistorical collation the neck, and a small flat black cap, about the size of a saucer, completes the costume.— Timbs’ Curiosities of London emendation.textual note

Note 2.—Page 70.

It appears that Christ’s Hospital was not originally founded as a school; its object was to rescue childrenalteration in the MS from the streets, to shelter, feed, clothe them, etc.—Timbs’ Curiosities of London.emendation explanatory note

Note 3.—Page 83.

The Duke of Norfolk’s Condemnation Commanded emendation.

The king was now approaching fast towards his end; and fearing lest Norfolk should escape him, he sent a message to the Commons, by which he desired them to hasten the bill, on pretence that Norfolk enjoyed the dignity of earl marshal, and it was necessary to appoint another, who might officiate at the ensuing ceremony of installing his son Prince of Wales.— Hume’shistorical collation History of England historical collation, vol. iii.emendation p. 307.

Note 4.—Page 99.

It was not till the end of this reign Henry VIIIemendation alteration in the MS that any salads, carrots, turnips, or other edible roots were produced in England. The little of these vegetables that was used, was formerly imported from Holland and Flanders. Queen Catherine, when she wanted a salad, was obliged to despatch a messenger thither on purpose.— Hume’salteration in the MS emendation History of England, vol. iii.emendation p. 314.alteration in the MS

[begin page 338]

Note 5.alteration in the MS—Page 105.

Attainder of Norfolk.

The house of peers, without examining the prisoner, without trial or evidence, passed a bill of attainder against him and sent it down to the commons. . . . The obsequious commons obeyed his the king’s directions; and the king, having affixed the royal assent to the bill by commissioners, issued orders for the execution of Norfolk on the morning of the twenty-ninth of January, the next day.emendation Hume’s History of historical collation England emendation, vol. iii. p.emendation 307historical collation emendation.

Note 6explanatory note.—Page 120.

The Loving-Cup.

The loving-cup, and the peculiar ceremonies observed in drinking from it, are older than English history. It is thought that both are Danish importations. As far back as knowledge goes, the loving-cup has always been drunk at English banquets. Tradition explains the ceremonies in this way: in the rude ancient times it was deemed a wise precaution to have both hands of both drinkers employed, lest while the pledger pledged his love and fidelity to the pledgee, the pledgee take that opportunity to slip a dirk into him!

Note 7.—Page 129.

The Duke of Norfolk’s Narrow Escape.

Had Henry VIII survived a few hours longer, his order for the duke’s execution would have been carried into effect. “But news being carried to the Tower that the king himself had expired that night, the lieutenant deferred obeying the warrant; and it was not thought advisable by the Council to begin a new reign byalteration in the MS the death of the greatest nobleman in the kingdom, who had been condemned by a sentence so unjust and tyrannical.”—Hume’s History of historical collation England emendation, vol. iii. p. 307emendation.

Note 8.—Page 164.

The Whipping-Boy.

James Iemendation and Charles IIemendation had whipping-boys, when they were little fellows, to take their punishment for them when they fell short in their lessons; so I have ventured to furnish my small prince with one, for my own purposes.

Notes to Chapter 15.—Page 180.

Character of Hertford.

The young king discovered an extreme attachment to his uncle, who was, in the main, a man of moderation and probity.—Hume’s History of historical collation England emendation, vol. iii. p. 324emendation.

But if he the Protector, alteration in the MS gave offencealteration in the MS by assuming too much state, he deserves great praise on account of the laws passed this session, by which the [begin page 339] rigor of former statutes was much mitigated,alteration in the MS and some security given to the freedom of the constitution. All laws were repealed which extended the crime of treason beyond the statute of the twenty-fifth of Edward III; all laws enacted during the late reign extending the crime of felony; all the former laws against Lollardy or heresy, together with the statute of the Six Articles. None were to be accused for words, but within a month after they were spoken. By these repeals several of the most rigorous laws that ever had passed in England were annulled; and some dawn, both of civil and religious liberty, began to appear to the people.alteration in the MS A repeal also passed of that law, the destruction of all laws, by which the king’s proclamation was made of equal force with a statute.— Ibid historical collation., vol. iii. p. 339emendation.alteration in the MS

Boiling to Death.

In the reign of Henry VIII, poisoners were, by act of parliament, condemned to be boiled to death. This act was repealed in the following reign.

In Germany, even in the 17th century, this horrible punishment was inflicted on coiners and counterfeiters. Taylor, the Water Poet, describes an execution he witnessed in Hamburg,alteration in the MS in 1616. The judgment pronounced against a coiner of false money was that he should “be boiled to death in oil; not thrown into the vessel at once, but with a pulley or rope to be hanged under the armpits, and then let down into the oil by degrees; first the feet, and next the legs, and so to boil his flesh from his bones alive.”—Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’s Blue Laws, True and False,emendation p. 13.

The Famous Stocking Case.

A woman and her daughter, nine years old, were hanged in Huntingdon for selling their souls to the devil, and raising a storm by pulling off their stockings!— Ibid.emendation, p. 20.

Note 10.—Page 197.

Enslaving.

So young a king, and so ignorant a peasant were likely to make mistakes—and this is an instance in point. This peasant was suffering from this law by anticipation; the king was venting his indignation against a law which was not yet in existence: for this hideous statute was to have birth in this little king’s own reigntextual note emendation. However, we know, from the humanity of his character, that it could never have been suggested by him.

Notes to Chapter 23explanatory note.—Pagealteration in the MS 251.

Death for Trifling Larcenies.

When Connecticut and New Haven were framing their first codes, larceny above the value of twelve pence was a capital crime in England—as it had been since the time of Henry I.—Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’s Blue Laws, True and False, p.emendation 13historical collation emendation.

[begin page 340]

The curious old book called “The English Rogue” makes the limit thirteen pence ha’penny; death being the portion of any who steal a thing “above the value of thirteen pence ha’penny.”

Notes to Chapter 27.—Page 284.

From many descriptions of larceny, the law expressly took away the benefit of clergy; to steal a horse, or a hawk, or woolen cloth from the weaver, was a hanging matter. So it was, to kill a deer from the king’s forest, or to export sheep from the kingdom.—Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’s Blue Laws, True and False, p. 13emendation.

William Prynne, a learned barrister, was sentenced—long after Edward the Sixth’s time—to lose both his ears in the pillory; to degradation from the bar; a fine of £3,000, and imprisonment for life. Three years afterwards, he gave new offencealteration in the MS to Laud, by publishing a pamphlet against the hierarchy. He was again prosecuted, and was sentenced to lose what remained of his ears; to pay a fine of £5,000; to be branded on both his cheeks with the letters S. L. (for Seditious Libeler,) and to remain in prison for life. The severity of this sentence was equaled by the savage rigor of its execution.— Ibid.emendation, pp. 11–12historical collation emendation.

Notes to Chapter 33explanatory note.—Page 332.

Christ’s Hospital, or Blue Coat School, “the Noblest Institution in the World.”alteration in the MS

The ground on which the Priory of the Grey Friars stood was conferred by Henry the Eighth on the Corporation of London, who caused the institutionalteration in the MS there of a home for poor boys and girls. Subsequently, Edward the Sixth caused the old Priory to be properly repaired, and founded within it that noble establishment called the Blue Coat School, or Christ’s Hospital, for the education and maintenance of orphans and the children of indigent persons. . . . . Edward would not let him Bishop Ridley depart till the letter was written, to the Lord Mayor, and then charged him to deliver it himself, and signify his special request and commandment, that no time might be lost in proposing what was convenient, and apprising him of the proceedings. The work was zealously undertaken, Ridley himself engaging in it; and the result was, the founding of Christ’s Hospital for the education of poor children.alteration in the MS The king endowed several other charities atalteration in the MS the same time. “Lord God,” said he, “I yield thee most hearty thanks that thou hast given me life thus long, to finish this work to the glory of thy name!” That innocent and most exemplary life was drawing rapidly to its close, and in a few days he rendered up his spirit to his Creator, praying God to defend the realm from Papistry.—alteration in the MS J. Heneage Jesse’s London: its Celebrated Characters and Places.emendation

In the Great Hall hangs a large picture of King Edward VIemendation seated on his throne, in a scarlet and ermined robe, holding the sceptre in his left hand, [begin page 341] and presenting with the other the Charter to the kneeling Lord Mayor. By his side stands the Chancellor, holding the seals, and next to him are other officers of state. Bishop Ridley kneels before him with uplifted hands, as if supplicating a blessing on the event; whilst the Aldermen, etc., with the Lord Mayor, kneel on both sides, occupying the middle ground of the picture; and lastly, in front, are a double row of boys on one side, and girls on the other, from the master and matron down to the boy and girl who have stepped forward from their respective rows, and kneel with raised hands before the king.—Timbs’ Curiosities of London, p.emendation 98.

Christ’s Hospital, by ancient custom, possesses the privilege of addressing the Sovereign on the occasion of his or her coming into the City to partake of the hospitality of the Corporation of London.—Ibid.

The Dining-Hall, with its lobby and organ-gallery, occupies the entire story, which is 187 feet long, 51 feet wide, and 47 feet high; it is lit by nine large windows, filled with stained glass on the south side; and is, next to Westminster Hall, the noblest room in the metropolis. Here the boys, now about 800 in number, dine; and here are held the “Suppings in Public,” to which visitors are admitted by tickets, issued by the Treasurer and by the Governors of Christ’s Hospital. The tables are laid with cheese in wooden bowls; beer in wooden piggins, poured from leathern jacks; and bread brought in large baskets. The official company enter; the Lord Mayor, or President, takes his seat in a state chair, made of oak from St. Catherine’semendation Church by the Tower; a hymn is sung, accompanied by the organ; a “Grecian,” or head boy, reads the prayers from the pulpit, silence being enforced by three drops of a wooden hammer. After prayer the supper commences, and the visitors walk between the tables. At its close, the “trade-boys” take up the baskets, bowls, jacks, piggins, and candlesticks, and pass in procession, the bowing to the Governors being curiously formal. This spectacle was witnessed by Queen Victoria and Prince Albert in 1845.alteration in the MS

Among the more eminent Blue Coat Boys are Joshua Barnes, editor of Anacreon and Euripides; Jeremiah Markland, the eminent critic, particularly in Greek literature; Camden, the antiquary; Bishop Stillingfleet; Samuel Richardson the novelist; Thomas Mitchell, the translator of Aristophanes; Thomas Barnes, many years editor of the London Times; Coleridge, Charles Lamb, and Leigh Hunt.alteration in the MS emendation

No boy is admitted before he is seven years old, or after he is nine; and no boy can remain in the school after he is fifteen, King’s boys and “Grecians” alone excepted. There are about 500 Governors, at the head of whom are the Sovereign and the Prince of Wales. The qualification for a Governor is payment of £500.— Ibid.textual note


[begin page 342]

GENERAL NOTE.textual note

One hears much about the “hideous Blue-Laws of Connecticut,”emendation and is accustomed to shudder piously when they are mentioned. There are people in America—and even in England!—who imaginealteration in the MS that they were a very monument of malignity, pitilessness, and inhumanityalteration in the MS. Whereas, in realityalteration in the MS they were about the first sweeping departure from judicial atrocity which the “civilized” world had seen. This humane and kindly Blue-Lawalteration in the MS code, of two hundred and forty years ago, stands all by itself,alteration in the MS with ages of bloody law on the further side of it, and a centuryalteration in the MS and three-quarters of bloody Englishalteration in the MS law on this side of it.alteration in the MS

There has never been a time emendation —under the Blue-Laws or any other—when above fourteen crimes were punishable by death in Connecticut. But in England, within the memory of men who are still hale in body and mind, two hundred and twenty-three crimes were punishable by death!* These facts are worth knowing—and worth thinking about, too.alteration in the MS

finis.



*See Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’s Blue Laws, True and False,emendation p. 11.
Historical Collation NOTES
  round (MS)  ●  around (A, E, C) 
  Hume’s (E)  ●  Hume  (MS, A, C) 
  History of England  (E)  ●  not in  (MS, A, C) 
  History of  (E)  ●  not in  (MS, A, C) 
  307 (I-C)  ●  306  (MS, A, E, C) 
  History of  (E)  ●  not in  (MS, A, C) 
  History of  (E)  ●  not in  (MS, A, C) 
  Ibid. (MS, A, C)  ●  Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’s Blue Laws, True and False  (E) 
  13 (I-C)  ●  17  (MS, A, E, C) 
  pp. 11–12 (I-C)  ●  p. 12 (MS, A, E, C) 
Editorial Emendations NOTES
  Timbs’ Curiosities of London  (I-C)  ●  Timbs’ “Curiosities of London.
  Timbs’ Curiosities of London. (I-C)  ●  Timbs’ “Curiosities of London.
  The Duke of Norfolk’s Condemnation Commanded  (A)  ●  The Duke of Norfolk’s Condemnation Commanded
  Hume’s History of England, vol. iii. (I-C)  ●  Hume, vol. III,
  Henry VIII (A)  ●  Henry VIII.
  Hume’s (I-C)  ●  Hume’s
  iii. (A)  ●  III.,
  day.]— (A)  ●  day.]ʌ
  Hume’s History of England  (I-C)  ●  Hume’s England
  vol. iii. p. (A)  ●  vol. III, p.
  307 (I-C)  ●  306
  Hume’s History of England  (I-C)  ●  Hume’s England
  vol. iii. p. 307 (A)  ●  vol. III, p. 307
  James I (A)  ●  James I.
  Charles II (A)  ●  Charles II.
  Hume’s History of England  (I-C)  ●  Hume’s England
  vol. iii. p. 324 (A)  ●  vol. III, p. 324
  Ibid., vol. iii. p. 339 (A)  ●  Ibid, vol. III, p. 339
  Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’s Blue Laws, True and False, (I-C)  ●  Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’s “Blue Laws, True and False,”
  Ibid. (A)  ●  Ibidʌ
  own reign (A)  ●  own reign
  Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’s Blue Laws, True and False, p. (I-C)  ●  Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’s “Blue Laws, True and False,” p.
  13 (I-C)  ●  17
  Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’s Blue Laws, True and False, p. 13 (I-C)  ●  Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull’sBlue Laws, True and False,” p. 13
  Ibid. (A)  ●  Ibidʌ
  pp. 11–12 (I-C)  ●  p. 12
  J. Heneage Jesse’s London: its Celebrated Characters and Places. (I-C)  ●  J. Heneage Jesse’sLondon:, its Celebrated Characters and Places.”
  Edward VI (A)  ●  Edward VI.
  Timbs’ Curiosities of London, p. (I-C)  ●  Timbs’ “Curiosities of London,” p.
  St. Catherine’s (A)  ●  St Catherine’s
  Hunt. (A)  ●  Hunt.—
  “hideous Blue-Laws of Connecticut,” (A)  ●  “hideous” Blue-Laws of Connecticut,ʌ
  never been a time  (A)  ●  NEVER BEEN A TIME
  Blue Laws, True and False, (I-C)  ●  “Blue Laws, True and False,”
Alterations in the Manuscript NOTES
 Note 1] ‘l’ follows what appears to be canceled ‘7’.
 most] interlined.
 regard] followed by canceled ‘t’.
 children] follows canceled ‘young’.
  Henry VIII] the MS readsHenry VIII.(emended); the brackets mended from parentheses; a superscript ‘s’ following ‘VIII.’ canceled.
 Hume's] the MS reads ‘Hume's’ (emended); interlined above canceled ‘Froude's’.
 vol. iii. p. 314.] the MS reads ‘vol. III., p. 314.’ (emended); possibly added later.
 Note 5.] originally ‘Note 4.’; ‘5.’ interlined following canceled ‘4’; two periods inadvertently left standing.
 reign by] ‘by’ interlined above canceled ‘with’, then canceled, then interlined again.
 But . . . p. 339.] added on the verso of the MS page with instructions to turn over.
  the Protector,] the brackets apparently added later; follows canceled ‘[Hertford’.
 offence] originally ‘offense’; the ‘c’ written over ‘s’.
 mitigated,] follows canceled ‘abated,’.
 people.] followed by canceled ‘—Ibid, vol. iii, p. 339.’
 Hamburg,] originally ‘Hamburgh’; the ‘h’ canceled and the comma added.
 Notes to Chapter 23.—Page] originally ‘Note 10. Page’; ‘11.’ interlined above canceled ‘10.’, then canceled; ‘Page’ canceled; ‘s’ added to ‘Note’, and ‘to Chapter 23. Page’ added. The dash added in this edition for uniformity. See the textual introduction, page 416.
 offence] originally ‘offense’; the ‘c’ written over ‘s’.
  School, “the . . . World.”] ‘ “the . . . World.” ’ added later; the comma mended from a period.
 institution] follows canceled ‘church’; followed by canceled ‘of a hospital’.
 children.] followed by canceled ‘[The king richly endowed some other’.
 charities at] ‘at’ interlined above canceled ‘of’.
 Papistry.—] followed by canceled ‘J. Heneage Jesse's’.
 1845.] followed by canceled ‘—Ibid.’
 Hunt.] originally ‘Hunt.—Ibid.’; ‘Ibid.’ canceled; the dash inadvertently left standing; emended.
  who imagine] interlined.
  and inhumanity] ‘andinterlined.
  in reality] interlined.
  Blue-Law] interlined.
  all by itself,] interlined above canceled ‘all by itself,’.
  a century] follows canceled ‘near’.
  English] interlined.
  side of it.] followed by canceled ‘These facts’.
  death!* These . . . too. . . . p. 11.] the asterisk, ‘These . . . too.’, and the following footnote apparently added later.
Textual Notes NOTES
 Timbs' . . . London.] As in the first English edition. Mark Twain wrote his notes hastily and out of their final order, leaving his citations in a jumble for his editors to fix. For instance, in the manuscript note 3 cites “Hume,” note 4 “Hume's History of England,” and note 5 “Hume's England.” Although the editors of the first American edition made some attempt to standardize the citations, they left many anomalies, and the forms of citations adopted here are from the first English edition.
 own reign] As in the first American edition. The manuscript reads “own reign,” as does the first English edition, set from proofs of the first American edition. Mark Twain, already in some embarrassment at having to explain the king's pronouncing the end of a law that did not yet exist, must have decided not to emphasize that the “hideous statute” was instituted in Edward's own reign. He probably dropped the italics from late proofs of the first American edition.
  Ibid.] At the bottom of the manuscript page ending here, Mark Twain wrote in ink 3 “(The ‘General Note’ follows, here, either after the dash.)” He followed his note with a curved dash, centered on the next line.
 GENERAL NOTE] In the top left corner of the manuscript page beginning here, Mark Twain wrote in ink 3 “Last.” In the top right portion of the page he wrote and canceled the direction “Put this paragraph in large type, leaded.”
Explanatory Notes NOTES
  notes 1 and 2] Both notes quote material in John Timbs's Curiosities of London (p. 96), although Mark Twain has silently omitted some information and slightly altered a few readings.
  note 6] Mark Twain found this information about the loving-cup in Timbs's Curiosities of London (p. 395n).
  notes to chapter 23] Mark Twain neglects to mention that the entire episode of the woman and the pig was taken with only minor changes from The English Rogue (1:63–65).
  notes to chapter 33] This information is quoted, with some liberty, from Jesse's London (3:225–226) and Timbs's Curiosities of London (pp. 98, 99, 101).